Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] VCARDDAV Digest, Vol 12, Issue 43

From: Jean-Luc Schellens <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 20:51:24 +0200

>   1. Re:  VCARDDAV Digest, Vol 12, Issue 33 (Andy Mabbett)
>
> In message <[email-masked]>, Jean- 
> Luc
> Schellens <[email-masked]> writes
>
>>> And you may know that someone lives with someone, without knowing
>>> their
>>> martial status.
>
>> Indeed and it's up to them to inform you (by inviting you to the
>> wedding ;o))
>> Do not forget: a vCard is to be "in touch", a relationship tool!
>
> It may be prudent for me to "remember" the name of my boss' or a
> client's partner. It would be very imprudent of me to ask if they were
> married or cohabiting.

  Andy, you just point THE issue!
It's the FIRST identity/privacy law:
"Let me know who you are as far as I'm concerned!"
Your boss will tell you he is married when you'll become really  
friends. (Before you will "remember" and stay prudent indeed ;o).
But I suppose he will then send you another, more personal, vCard!
That's why for me, KIND is also a way to define different  
"perso" (unlike in the Mac address book) cards!
Regards
Jean-Luc
_______________________________________________
VCARDDAV mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav