Subject: Re: 57th IETF WG/BOF Scheduling - Draft Agenda (as of June 19th)

From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 14:33:17 -0400

In message <[email-masked]>, Randy Bush writes:
>> Switching with OPSEC on?
>> 
>> Thursday
>> 1300-1500 Afternoon Sessions I
>> Hall LM APP     trade   Internet Open Trading Protocol WG
>> Hall NO INT     atommib AToM MIB WG
>> Hall F2 INT     eap     Extensible Authentication Protocol WG *
>> Hall GH OPS     opsec   Operational Security Requirements BOF
>> Hall IK SUB     ppvpn   Provider Provisioned Virtual Private Networks WG *
>> Hall E2 TSV     pmtud   Path Maximum Transmission Unit Discovery PWG
>> Hall F1 TSV     sipping Session Initiation Proposal Investigation
>
>opsec has not conflicts with ispmon.  but, if i read it aright,
>
>1500-1530 Break (Refreshments provided) - 
>1530-1730 Afternoon Sessions II
>APP 	lemonade License to Enhance Messaging Oriented Network Access for 
>	    	 Diverse Endpoints WG
>INT     ddbof    Device Discovery BOF
>OPS     ipfix    IP Flow Information Export WG
>OPS     ispmon   Monitoring Infrastructure Deployment BOF
>SEC	saag	 Open Security Area Directorate
>TSV	rddp	 Remote Direct Data Placement WG
>TSV     seamoby  Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and
>                 Dormant Mode Host Alerting WG
>
>that would put opsec next to saag, which may or may not cause whining
>from the security community
>

It would indeed be bad.

		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)