Subject: Re: TMDA redux

From: Eric Burger <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:23:22 -0700

+1

I vote for working code versus the theory of TDMA bounces to unsuspecting
spoofed From addresses.  If someone's address is hijacked, they will be
getting bounces anyway.  I doubt we would be adding significantly to that
traffic, while I would be reducing significantly our (WG Chair) traffic.

On 3/29/08 11:18 AM, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
wrote:

> OK, it seems spam is again getting worse.  At the beginning of the week,
> I had 2-3 spams caught per-day.  Today, I am up to 16 caught by the
> mailman admin interface.  I expect that this will continue to rise, and
> I have to say that pending to this is just not a good use for my time.
> 
> John

Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.